WebFeb 13, 2024 · In Harvey v Niland and others, evidence was obtained by hacking into the respondent's Facebook account. He argued that the accessing of his Facebook … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECGHC/2015/149.html
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Does the right to privacy protect …
WebFeb 24, 2024 · [12] On 14 July 2015 Niland asked to meet with Harvey. It was a short meeting. Niland told Harvey that the time had come for “a parting of the ways”. He did not mention the affair. Harvey asked him to sign a resignation letter. Niland refused, as there was some disagreement about the ownership of two Toyotas – a Fortuner and a Land … WebMay 9, 2016 · The High Court dealt with such issues in Harvey v Niland and Others (5021/2015) [2015] ZAECGHC 149 (3 December 2015). In this case, the applicant, Mr Harvey, and the first respondent, Mr Niland, were the only members of a close corporation, Huntershill Safaris CC (Huntershill), which offers professional hunting services to its … black cloth container with lid
The right to privacy will not always be an adequate defence
WebJul 6, 2024 · Just like any other piece of evidence, in order to get social media evidence admitted at trial, a lawyer must be able to prove that the information is relevant. FED. R. EVID. 401, 403. Furthermore, all evidence in a party’s possession, custody, or control is subject to the duty to preserve and authenticity. People v. WebWhen Harvey and Niland, sole members of a close corporation, fell out, Niland left the workplace but remained a member of the corporation. Later, when Harvey began to suspect Niland of secretly competing against the corporation and violating his fiduciary duties, he sought a prohibitory interdict. WebFeb 13, 2024 · In Harvey v Niland and others , evidence was obtained by hacking into the respondent's Facebook account. He argued that the accessing of his Facebook communications was an infringement of his fundamental right to privacy and constituted a criminal offence. black cloth detergent